Skip to Main Content

Cultivating a Culture of Assessment: Methodology

2014-2015 Assessment in Action (AiA) project

Inquiry Question

“What is the effect of completing multiple collaborative assignments (created by a  faculty member and librarian) on student’s Information literacy skills and capacity for lifelong learning?”

 

Student Feedback

How did my use of library resources & services contribute to what I learned?

“…Honestly, other than one other professor, I have not been introduced to the vastness the library has to offer. Granted (resources) are mentioned in the syllabus but if other students are like me, they are not going to utilize something unless it is a requirement.
      Maybe you could offer a library resources workshop to get the word out. However with the student body being so distributed, it probably needs to come from the main line of communication—the professors.”

 

Background & Methods

Luther Seminary is implementing more assessment across the educational process.  Changes during academic year 2014-2015:

  • Academic program outcomes are being refined
  • New curriculum implemented
  • A-F now default grading system (previously Pass/Fail)
  • Syllabi follow a consistent structure
  • Professors/students learning to develop & use rubrics
  • Portfolios introduced

Seminary accreditation standards, goals, and outcomes support equipping students for lifelong learning. We believe these can be attained through fostering a community of practice. The new curriculum spurred the library to take a fresh look at information literacy.

Process & Methods

The library partnered with faculty on several assignments to teach multiple skills from the emerging Information Literacy Framework (ACRL). Working with five professors (seven classes) over two semesters, we matched information literacy skills with existing assignments, wrote rubrics, surveyed students, gathered data and looked for ways to improve library services, instruction and support.

Assignments, Conclusions, and Next Steps

Assignments

  • Annotated bibliography
  • Evaluating online resources
  • Finding film & video resources
  • Compare a keyword search in Google vs. a library database
  • Multimedia presentation skills
  • Research log for thesis writers

Conclusions

  • Market library products and services more effectively, e.g., identify e-reserve resources more clearly, create YouTube tutorials, and LibGuides
  • Refine assessment methods: qualitative responses from an open-ended course evaluation question provided the most useful data

Next Steps

  • Recruit new faculty partners
  • Collaborate to develop assignments that build information literacy skills
  • Create sample skill rubrics from the Information Literacy Framework
  • Improve data design, collection, analysis

 

Subject Guide